The Securities and Exchange Commission published Release No. 34-106841, announcing KalshiEX LLC’s filing to revise the listing standards for its perpetual security futures products. The amendments would allow qualifying products linked to certain newly public companies to begin trading as early as the second business day following an IPO.

For founders, fintech platforms, and businesses developing innovative financial products, the significance extends beyond a shorter listing timeline. The filing illustrates how an exchange can adapt established regulatory frameworks to support new products while retaining substantial eligibility requirements.

What Are Perpetual Security Futures?

The filing describes Kalshi’s perpetual security futures products as cash-settled contracts that provide exposure to the price of an underlying equity security and have no predetermined expiration date.

These products provide economic exposure to a stock’s price through a derivative contract. Holding the contract does not itself make the holder a shareholder in the underlying company.

According to the filing, Kalshi operates as a CFTC-designated contract market and is notice-registered with the SEC as a national securities exchange for security futures products. Its existing listing standards for these products were adopted through a separate September 2026 filing.

The November filing addresses a narrower issue: how quickly a newly public stock can become eligible to underlie a perpetual security futures product on Kalshi.

What Is Changing?

Kalshi proposes two changes to its initial listing criteria: an alternative trading-volume test for securities with less than one month of trading history and a limited waiver of the existing five-day price lookback.

1. An Earlier Route to Satisfying the Trading-Volume Requirement

Under the existing standards described in the filing, an underlying security generally must have an average daily transaction value of at least $450 million over the preceding six months.

For a security listed for less than six months, the existing alternative requires an average daily transaction value of at least $1 billion over the preceding month. That test effectively prevents a newly public security from qualifying before it has accumulated a month of trading history.

The amendment would introduce a separate test for securities listed for less than one month: at least 2.4 million shares traded across all markets since the IPO day.

This would allow a security to meet the trading-volume criterion without waiting a full month, provided it also satisfies the other applicable listing requirements.

The filing defines the IPO day as the first day the security trades “regular way” on a national securities exchange.

2. A Limited Waiver of the Five-Day Price Lookback

The existing rule generally requires an underlying covered security to have a closing price of at least $3 for the five consecutive business days preceding the listing of the perpetual security futures product.

Kalshi proposes a limited waiver of that lookback for certain covered securities during the first three business days following their IPO. Under the accelerated route, trading in the derivative could begin on or after the second business day following the IPO day, excluding the IPO day itself.

To qualify for the waiver, the issuer must have had a market capitalization of at least $3 billion based on its IPO offering price. Other listing criteria would continue to apply.

For example, assuming no intervening holidays, a qualifying security that begins trading on a Monday could potentially have a Kalshi perpetual security futures product begin trading on Wednesday.

The $100 Billion Requirement Still Applies

One of the most consequential details in the filing is the distinction between two market-capitalization thresholds.

The $3 billion IPO valuation threshold applies to eligibility for the limited price-lookback waiver. It does not replace Kalshi’s separate requirement that an underlying security have a current market capitalization of at least $100 billion.

A company valued at $3 billion at its IPO would therefore not qualify solely because it meets that threshold.

The accelerated process is designed for the large, actively traded IPO securities that can satisfy the full set of Kalshi’s listing standards.

What Requirements Remain?

The filing states that the amendments do not change the other eligibility criteria for underlying securities.

Those criteria include requirements concerning:

• Registration and listing on a U.S. national securities exchange and status as an NMS security.

• A public float of at least seven million shares.

• Estimated deliverable supply exceeding 20 million shares.

• Compliance by the issuer with applicable periodic reporting obligations.

• At least 2,000 security holders, whether of record or beneficial.

The practical change is a shorter route through particular trading-history requirements. Eligibility still depends on the broader rulebook.

Why Kalshi Is Pursuing the Change

Kalshi argues that earlier availability of perpetual security futures could give market participants additional tools to hedge exposure to newly public companies.

The exchange also points to comparable changes adopted by securities options exchanges to accelerate the availability of options following qualifying IPOs.

That comparison matters to the regulatory framework. As the filing explains, Section 6(h)(3)(C) of the Securities Exchange Act requires listing standards for security futures products to be no less restrictive than comparable standards for options traded on a national securities exchange.

Kalshi’s position is that its amendments satisfy that requirement.

The filing also describes real-time surveillance and information-sharing arrangements intended to help detect misconduct. Its statements about improved hedging, reduced volatility, and investor protection are the exchange’s stated rationale, rather than independent SEC findings establishing those outcomes.

What This Means for Founders and Newly Public Companies

For companies approaching an IPO at a scale sufficient to meet these thresholds, the filing raises a practical planning consideration: derivatives referencing their shares may become available soon after public trading begins.

From a legal and operational perspective, that possibility supports reviewing how existing policies address instruments linked to company stock. Relevant questions may include:

• Do employee trading policies clearly address derivatives and indirect economic exposure?

• Do hedging restrictions cover the instruments employees may encounter?

• Are investor-relations teams prepared to explain the difference between company shares and third-party derivative products?

• Do public communications accurately distinguish ownership rights from price exposure?

The filing does not impose these policy changes on issuers. They are practical considerations arising from the possibility of earlier derivative trading.

What Fintech and Digital Asset Businesses Can Learn

Although the underlying securities in this filing are equities, the development is relevant to businesses building new trading platforms and financial products.

Product classification should inform the business model early. The filing illustrates the interaction between SEC and CFTC requirements for security futures. A commercial label alone does not establish the regulatory treatment of a product.

Listing criteria can determine the addressable market. A faster listing process may create opportunities, but the retained $100 billion current market-capitalization requirement materially limits the companies whose securities can qualify.

Established regulatory precedents can support innovation. Kalshi grounds its amendments partly in standards already used by options exchanges. For businesses proposing new products, comparable regulated structures can provide a useful starting point for legal analysis.

Access to price exposure must be explained precisely. Customer disclosures should clearly describe the contract, its settlement mechanics, and the rights it provides. Economic exposure to a company’s stock is distinct from ownership of that stock.

Effective Date and Comment Process

Despite the notice’s title referring to “immediate effectiveness,” the body of the release expressly states that the rule change will become effective on November 19, 2026.

The filing also states that, within 60 days of effectiveness, the SEC may, after consultation with the CFTC, summarily abrogate the change and require it to be refiled under the ordinary Section 19(b)(1) process.

The SEC is soliciting public comments under File No. SR-KALSHIEX-2026-03. The PDF specifies a deadline of 21 days after publication in the Federal Register, but leaves the actual calendar date as a placeholder. Anyone considering a submission should confirm the published deadline before filing.

Learn More

This blog post is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Please consult with a Launch Legal attorney regarding your specific situation.