On August 19, 2026, President Trump convened crypto and financial industry leaders alongside SEC Chair Paul Atkins, CFTC Chair Michael Selig, and White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt for a White House meeting centered on the next phase of U.S. digital asset policy.

The headline was the CLARITY Act. But the more consequential takeaway may be what happens if Congress does not act.

The administration’s message was increasingly clear: market structure legislation remains the preferred path, but federal regulators are preparing to move forward with rulemaking under their existing authority if legislation stalls.

That creates an important September inflection point for crypto companies operating in, or considering entering, the United States.

CLARITY Remains the Legislative Priority

President Trump used the meeting to call on Congress to pass what he described as a “fair version” of the CLARITY Act.

The legislation is intended to establish a federal market structure for digital assets, including clearer jurisdictional lines between the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

SEC Chair Paul Atkins reinforced the administration’s legislative focus, describing congressional passage of CLARITY as the “most important priority” and stating that the SEC is supporting that effort.

That matters because agency rulemaking can address significant portions of the current regulatory uncertainty, but legislation can establish a more durable allocation of authority between regulators.

The SEC made that distinction explicit just one day before the White House meeting. In announcing its proposed Regulation Crypto Assets framework on August 18, Atkins said legislation remains “indispensable” to establishing durable rules of the road for the industry.

In other words, the agencies are writing rules, but they would still prefer Congress to write the architecture.

The Agencies Are Not Waiting

CFTC Chair Michael Selig offered perhaps the clearest indication of what happens if Congress cannot get CLARITY across the finish line.

Selig said the CFTC stands ready to implement the legislation if enacted, but added that the Commission would “use every tool available” to advance the administration’s digital asset agenda in the meantime.

That statement came alongside a broader CFTC regulatory roadmap. The following day, the Commission convened the inaugural meeting of its Innovation Advisory Committee, including discussion of crypto regulatory evolution, jurisdiction and the development of a durable framework for emerging financial markets.

The SEC is already further down that road.

On August 18, it proposed Regulation Crypto Assets, a framework designed to create tailored pathways for crypto capital formation and address questions that have historically been forced into securities rules developed for conventional issuers and instruments.

Taken together, the sequencing is notable:

Congress gets the first opportunity to establish comprehensive market structure. If Congress does not move, the SEC and CFTC appear prepared to continue building significant pieces of that structure themselves.

Why September Matters

White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt also pointed toward September as an important legislative window, with agency rulemakings positioned behind congressional action.

That changes how companies should think about the current policy environment.

For much of the last several years, the central regulatory question for crypto businesses was whether Washington would provide clearer rules at all.

The question now appears to be which institution will provide them first.

If Congress advances CLARITY, the industry could receive a statutory framework defining the respective roles of the SEC and CFTC and establishing rules that are more difficult for a future administration to reverse.

If Congress does not act, the regulatory agenda does not necessarily stop. Instead, more of the framework may emerge through SEC and CFTC rulemaking, interpretations, exemptions and other exercises of existing authority.

That distinction matters.

Agency rules can create meaningful operating pathways, but their durability, statutory foundations and susceptibility to future modification may differ significantly from legislation enacted by Congress.

The Regulatory Queue Is Becoming Visible

The August 19 meeting is therefore significant for more than the administration’s continued support for digital assets.

It revealed something closer to a regulatory sequence.

First: push Congress to enact comprehensive market structure legislation.

Second: continue developing SEC and CFTC frameworks in parallel.

Third: if the legislative process stalls, use existing agency authority to fill as much of the remaining regulatory gap as possible.

For founders, exchanges, token issuers, funds and other market participants, that means regulatory planning should not be based solely on whether the CLARITY Act passes.

Companies should also be watching the rulemakings developing behind it.

The SEC’s Regulation Crypto Assets proposal already demonstrates how consequential those agency actions can be. Additional SEC and CFTC initiatives could affect everything from token issuance and secondary trading to exchange registration, custody, market structure and the jurisdictional treatment of particular digital assets.

What Crypto Companies Should Be Watching

September could provide considerably more information about which version of U.S. crypto regulation ultimately takes shape.

Market participants should be watching the progress of the CLARITY Act, but also the SEC and CFTC regulatory agendas developing alongside it. Proposed rules, comment periods and agency interpretations may become increasingly important if congressional negotiations extend beyond the current legislative window.

The broader shift is already visible.

Washington is moving away from a regulatory environment defined primarily by enforcement and uncertainty and toward one in which Congress and federal agencies are competing, and in some cases coordinating, to define affirmative rules for the digital asset market.

For crypto companies, the next question is no longer simply whether clearer rules are coming.

It is whether those rules will arrive through Congress, the agencies, or both — and how the differences between those pathways should shape decisions being made today.

Learn More

This blog post is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Please consult with a Launch Legal attorney regarding your specific situation.